Immensely.

Now if we can get two in damp cotton pants and no bra, that's a coincidence.

If we can get three, well looks like we've got ourselves a convoy.

jbh3,

A valid criticism sir. Also, the confidence that some behaviors carry little, if any, penalty, often changes the nature of these conversations.

Does chocolate help strawberries? *SLURP*



:p :D :p

I wasted all that time and energy on politics while wyndhy was across the room in damp panties and no bra!
I'm ashamed of myself and deserve to be SPANKED!!! ;)

^^^i'll leave the spankings to lil ... this way i can observe how a true master does it. ;)



actually, i prefer my strawberries covered in thick, sweet cream. :p:D

I like your 'strawberry' covered in thick, sweet cream too. *SLURP*




:p :D :p

I've learned that the one thing we can all agree upon is that wyndhy's damp panties can unite us.

as JFK said ... ask not what pixies can do for you, but what you can do for pixies. :D

speaking of fitzgeralds ... bonjour!
:p:D

Scotz, how he got into that situation is really irrelevant. He was under oath and he committed perjury. Just because a bunch of politicians dug up crap on him (which happens to almost ALL politicians) doesn't give him or any other citizen the right to lie under sworn testimony. Clinton will forever be on the wrong side of that issue, in my opinion, because he broke the law.

C'mon now, PF...you know the President doesn't unilaterally make laws. Congress makes laws. POTUS signs them into law. Patriot Act, as controversial as it is, can't be a law unless Congress votes to make it so.

Question: Is violating a copyright against the law in Australia?

People are extradited to other countries all the time to stand trial for crimes. Why just call out the US?

So you think an international court should decide whether or not Neil Entwistle should face murder charges for killing his wife in the U.S. and then fleeing to the U.K.?

I’m not familiar with the person or the case, but I would first ask if he was a US or British citizen. If a crime was committed in one country and the accused was a citizen, at home, in another country, I want to know what agreements the countries have for such issues. If there is no consensus between the governments, then an international court should make a judgment to IT’S STANDARDS, based on the information provided by the two governments. Neither that international court, or any other government, should have enforcement rights of IT’S VERDICT and sentence until the person was given over by an authority within it’s jurisdiction.

All this hypothesizing is not really a concern though. Your illustration sounded to me like a crime against another person. That will never have the priority of $$$ matters or an offence against a ‘system’. You and I and our families are utterly meaningless in such matters.

PantyFanatic,

These are extradition treaties. The one applicable to this situation is the U.S.-U.K. Extradition Treaty.